Setting: Small rural hospital. The hospital is coping with an influx of refugees who are attempting to return to their home villages after having been displaced for two years in a neighbouring country due to armed conflict.

Scenario: A female patient of child-bearing age is brought to the hospital with severe abdominal pain. She is not accompanied by any family or friends. She is in distress and appears to the expatriate nurse to have an intellectual disability, although it is difficult to make this assessment due to a language barrier.

During an investigative surgery, the surgeon elects to perform a medically unnecessary tubal ligation. There is no prior discussion of this procedure with the patient or even with other members of the surgical team.

After the surgery, the surgeon declares to his colleagues that the decision was his responsibility alone to make and challenges them to say whatever they have to say and then leave it. He tells them that the procedure was necessary because the patient was not able to take care of herself, so she couldn’t possibly take care of somebody else.

Days later the expatriate nurse remains distressed and wonders if she should have acted differently.

Analysis: Apply this case to the Humanitarian Healthcare Ethics Analysis Tool (HHEAT). The HHEAT  is intended to facilitate discussion and deliberation for those involved in ethically challenging situations and will assist humanitarian healthcare workers in implementing well-considered decisions.  The six steps are designed to help you or your team structure reflection and deliberation on the ethical dilemma presented in the case study. You may skip questions that appear less relevant to the issue or explore dimensions pertinent to the context but not listed in the tool.

Download PDF and Worksheet

Disclaimer: Case studies in the ENHA (Ethics Narratives in Humanitarian Aid) series are based on the reflections of humanitarian healthcare workers on ethical challenges experienced in the field. While the stories presented in the cases draw on real events and the accounts of real persons, many stories are composites in which similar experiences are woven together. In all of the stories, details such as names, dates, locations, career and life stage, gender, and profession have been changed, obscured, or omitted. Any resemblance the stories may bear to actual persons, places, and events is co-incidental.

While the stories often aim to show what the protagonist is thinking or feeling, the Humanitarian Healthcare Ethics Research Group’s intent as the stories’ author is not to suggest that the values and assumptions held by a story’s protagonist are those of all or many humanitarian healthcare workers. Similarly, the values, opinions and actions of a protagonist or other actors in a story should not be understood to reflect those of, or be endorsed by, the Humanitarian Healthcare Ethics Research Group.

How to cite: Humanitarian Healthcare Ethics. 2014. ENHA Case Study Series: Sterilization of a Patient without Her Consent. www.humanitarianhealthethics.net.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s